KESS_vs_SWRO Desalination

Salt Water
Reverse Osmosis Systems
(SWRO)

SWRO is very expensive to build, operate and maintain, is energy inefficient, implements expensive SWRO membranes, requires high energy pressure pumps and returns more than 50% of a highly toxic, environmentally hazardous waste material back to the water source.

Kinetic Energy Solar Still
(KESS®©)

KESS is a revolutionary new scaleable, water desalination system which operates on renewable energy sources, is very energy efficient, requires minimal maintenance, reduces waste, has a very small carbon footprint, has no membranes to change and no water returns to the source: salt is the only by-product.

KESSWater.com
How much power does KESS require to produce fresh water? or
How many kilowatt hours (kWh) / per Meter3 fresh water?
(…and that’s just the start of the cost and operational problems for SWRO…)
 

In the SWRO (sea water reverse osmosis) and heat evaporation worlds, this is one of the most important and used defining attributes of any system.

For KESSWater.com, this is not as relevant a term, though the equivalent will be offered here to try and put things on as equal a level playing field as possible.

For those that just want a quick answer…at the cost of putting the cart before the horse a bit, the quick, rough answer is approx.. * = < 1kWh /1 meter
3 water.

To put things into grand perspective.  A typical SWRO plant requires up to 10 kWh ( over 10X/1,000% times) the energy to produce a cubic meter of water.  

All SWRO systems produce water that still has salt in it… many passes are required to get to a potable quality water… KESSWater on the other hand, requires only a single pass to produce nearly ion free deionized/distilled water.

That is just the beginning of the downfall of all SWRO systems however.  

KESSWater has almost none of the permanent infrastructure, machinery, parts and maintenance expenses of SWRO.

There are no semi-permeable membranes, high psi pumps, high amp motors, combustion chambers, high pressure vessels, or SS plumbing, etc.… for it all… Not to mention the infrastructure and/or storage facilities for whatever fossil fuel is being used… to boil the water, to produce the steam, to turn the blades, to generate the electricity, to push the motors, to drive the 1,000 psi pumps, through the semi-permeable membranes, etc., etc.,  etc…  In KESSWater, you can just throw all of that away.

In other words, KESSWater cells will have almost a 100% online operating efficiency.    There is virtually nothing to ever go bad or wrong.

Compare that to any SWRO system ever manufactured whose average downtime is about one month (800 hrs.) a year.   So, let’s say a KESSWater field has 10 systems, all operating autonomously and independently.  When one is down for 30 minutes a week to be cleaned, the other nine are still operating at full capacity.  Compare that to SWRO.

The reason for the “*” above is that unlike SWRO systems, the KESSWater answer changes a bit and depends upon a few atmospheric variables.  Water temp., air temp., atmospheric pressure, etc.

On a hot, arid day, low pressure day with warm water temps., the production is different than a cold, humid, high-pressure day.  Both extremes produce water at significantly less energy cost than SWRO, but the actual number varies with the conditions, even in a closed KESSWater cell system.

KESS technology will work and play well with existing SWRO facilities to mitigate the adverse environmental impact of SWRO’s return waste toxic brine.

It’s no secret that Reverse Osmosis salt water desalination (SWRO) has severe environmental impact issues. Whole geographic marine regions are suffering greatly, or have already died from the highly toxic saline brine that has/is back-washed into the seas and oceans. Marine life and irreplaceable coral reefs have been killed. Environmental groups worldwide stand firmly united against SWRO.

To this end, KESS technology will work in tandem, extremely well with, SWRO plants worldwide. By reducing the return volume of SWRO toxic brine, KESS will work in concert with, not adversarially against, existing SWRO technology.

As KESS technology has no membranes to plug and foul, nor high pressure pumps to fail, nor expensive electrical utilities (with exceptionally high carbon footprint) to drain; KESS Technology easily steps in and accepts the high saline brine direct from SWRO plants, and reduces it to bag-able salt, and fresh water. The remaining salable salt will either be made available to claim, will be hauled away by outside contracted services to process the material for valuable minerals, or stored at approved sites.

So, whether wholly renewable powered discrete KESS cells are installed independently to desalinate salt and brackish water, or KESS cells are amended to existing facilities as a “plug ‘n play” SWRO brine reduction solution, KESS technology has a role to play in protecting the environment.

Brine reduction greatly mitigates the adverse impact that SWRO has in every location, planet wide.

The Layman’s Guide to KESS®© Technologies
Optimized Modular Desalination Cells
Helping to solve the world’s fresh water shortage


Many have asked for a simple concise guide to complement the KESS Science and Patent White Papers, which focuses on the “how” and “why” questions, primarily utilizing the physics and the math.

While appropriate for some, most people aren’t really interested in formulas, variables, equations, etc. … just a simple quick explanation, “What is “It”, and How does “It” work? ...in straightforward simple to understand language.

So here goes.

What is KESS? KESS Cells represents the ability to affordably and economically extract fresh water from salt/brackish waters on a modularly based large scale, without RO membranes, motors, and pumps. At its lowest common denominator, KESS (Kinetic Energy Solar Still) captures and sums many small incremental improvements and discovered physics phenomena, to vastly increase the overall efficiency of desalination systems, while importantly, requiring only renewable energy (solar, wind, donkeys/camels walking in circles, etc.).

When people ask how KESS works (recently U.S. Patents and Intr’l WIPO Trademark published), our best reply, to date, has been to use an example most all of us can relate to. We offer that, generally speaking, KESS can be thought of as a “hurricane in a box”. Painting that “word picture” pretty much says it all.

Just like birds hinting to men, that flight Was possible, hurricanes can lead us to understand, and offer many hints for how to extract fresh drinkable water from the saline oceans/seas.

Most everyone knows that hurricanes are responsible for extracting and collecting massive amounts of fresh water, from the salt water oceans/seas, transporting and dumping (sometimes many feet of it), onto dry land. We’ve seen and experienced this first hand.

The planet is what scientists universally call an “open system”. That is, man can’t and doesn’t control any of these many processes… We can only observe, monitor, and record the results. How fast are the winds? What are the air and water temps? Where and how much water is collected? What is the air pressure? Etc.…

But, What If, what IF, in a fully enclosed “closed system” you could not only observe and monitor these variables, but control, optimize and maximize them at the same time as well? The standard accepted evaporation predication equation used for almost 60 years has only (6) variables. KESS not only controls these variables in a “box” (closed system), but adds another (10) previously undescribed and primarily unknown variables; while simultaneously optimizing and maximizing each. And when you sum all these small (and some large) incremental improvements, within a closed system, the resultant production gain is sizeable.

We KNOW (control and optimize) how the fresh water separates/evaporates from the salt water. We KNOW (control and optimize) where and when the water will condense and collect. We KNOW (and control) what the internal temps and pressures are. We KNOW (and maximize) what the evaporative surface areas are; (no longer squared on a level (X*Y), but rather nearly (X*Y) ^3)) inside the system. How? In some part, by optimizing the surface areas and controlled via programmed internal micro voltage powered PLC’s (automated computer controls), sensors and valves.

IF you understand and comply with the physics and what the math says MUST happen, the rest is seemingly straightforward, providing the appropriate are known and controlled.

The autonomous discrete and modular KESS Cell devices actually then become the derivate result of what the equations describe. In fact, you can see the parts in situ and their corresponding variables. It all makes perfect sense, once seen in the proper light.

Let’s take a step back and quickly look at the competing desalination technologies and how they compare to KESS. Reverse Osmosis (RO), standard and multi-effect Solar Desalination.

RO systems, universally, all share common theory and attributes. Push salt water through semi-permeable membranes that capture the salt ions, using much of this extracted water to backflush the salt out of the membranes, then dump the resulting (highly toxic concentrated) brine back into the source (sea, ocean, etc.), then repeat.

What pressures do RO and salt water RO (SWRO) systems require? Anywhere from 1,000 – 2,000 psi… Which is a LOT. This requires expensive, often replaced membranes, huge, expensive pumps, and even larger high wattage, power draining motors. And, afterwards you’re dumping more than half of the intake water right back into the ocean/sea, as a highly toxic, environmentally hazardous waste material concentrated brine that kills everything in huge “dead zones”. That’s RO (SWRO), in a nutshell. “Good, bad, and ugly.”

Note: It should be strongly emphasized here that KESS technology, (owing to the absence of foulable/clogged membranes), will be working extremely well in concert with, (not against) SWRO plants. How? KESS can easily accept the toxic effluent water from SWRO systems, and efficiently reduce it down to its baggable byproducts salt, and water. KESS can effortlessly go places where no RO system can.

Let’s now look at some of the earlier attempts at solar desalination. Many bright, learned, and well-funded people have failed in these directions. Ignoring (or perhaps unfamiliar with the physics and underlying principles). Earlier systems attempted to focus maximum solar energy (with large parabolic mirrors, etc.) onto static, horizontal, minimized, surface areas (long round pipe tubes, etc.)

As it was “known and assumed” that water needed to heated to the boiling point for steam to form, and desalination to occur, all of these systems required high temps (at 212º F/100ºC), which (according to the basic gas laws) necessarily resulted in high vapor pressures (which in actuality was acting in direct opposition to the evaporation they were trying to achieve) resulting in the need for even more (expensive) power to inefficiently compensate, then condense and collect the water. These scenarios created multiple problems. The pipes quickly clogged; systems failed. And, for the short time they were operating, only ran during daylight hours. (Note: KESS operates 24/7).

Memo/Hint: The take away to be learned from water boiling isn’t the high joule input and temperatures required, rather, it is the continuous release of gas from solution, which unbinds/captures and frees water molecules from solution as the air rises from the liquid. KESS induces a volumetric “gas release” via much less costly means than the mega joules required for boiling water.

Lets’ look at how hurricanes (and KESS) operate. As with hurricanes, KESS doesn’t require high pressures… In fact, hurricanes and KESS operate efficiently at very low pressures, minus psi, not 1,000-2,000 psi. Likewise, KESS doesn’t require high temps, in fact KESS operates efficiently at around 90ºF, like every hurricane. And KESS, like hurricanes, are anything but static, like all other prior solar desalination systems.

In fact, KESS derives its WIPO World trademarked name in part, from a highly agitated, violent, environment, just like hurricanes, by introduction of kinetic mixing on several levels. As no/little pressure or mechanical torque/friction is introduced into the system (relative to RO), very little costly power is necessary or required.

Hurricanes condense water by cooling and other processes; so does KESS, but not by going up in elevation, but by increasing atmospheric pressure (again while simultaneously decreasing atmospheric pressure in the prior evaporation phase), and then going downward with the humidified air flow, utilizing the earth’s “universal” planet wide, below grade ambient temperature, to create temperature delta drops often in excess of 40º-50ºF, to cool the surface collection elements, necessary for condensation optimization.

So, if you look at the directions all the others have taken, and they have all gone in one direction, KESS goes in the exact opposite… When they all have Zigged, KESS has Zagged…. This is a brief summary, with many of the “classified” details obviously omitted, but in general, That’s KESS in a nutshell.

Floatable: KESS Cells are not necessarily land based as might be expected or presumed. It should be inserted here that KESS cells are designed and engineered to also float. Where protected bays, inlets, and harbors are the only space available, KESS cells can produce their fresh water, while floating.

KESS downsides: Nothing is perfect or free and this paper would be incomplete without mentioning both sides of the equation. While KESS will be much cheaper to install and operate, easier to use, far more energy efficient, and (most critically) - completely environmentally benign and Safe, KESS Cells are not the best solution in all situations.

  • KESS requires substantially more land area (3-4X) than RO, on a strictly - m^3 water produced / m^2 land area basis. So if land area is unavailable or at a high premium, KESS may not be the best solution. Piping the salt/saline water to inexpensive unused land for KESS to operate may offer the best compromise.
  • KESS still needs critical health minerals (mg+, etc.) re-added to the produced fresh water (like all distilled/bottled water) if used for long term drinking purposes.
  • KESS does not seamlessly work in VOC (volatile organic compound/high vapor pressure) contaminated water sources. IF necessary a VOC pre-treatment system is still required.
  • If the byproduct(s) is/are not a valuable /saleable commodity (like salt), then an approved storage site and transportation may be required.

That being said; in most situations KESS will likely be the only cost effective and viable alternative to RO today. In areas without access to substantial electrical power, or a continuous/affordable fuel source, KESS is potentially the only option. In relation to the environment and planet, the choice is clear.




For more information, contact: Mark D Goodley at (840) 999-2629: markdgoodley@gmail.com

תרגום לעברית
Hebrew Translation


תאי התפלה מודולריים אופטימליים
"עוזרים לפתור את המחסור העולמי במי שתייה"


רבים ביקשו מסמך שיתאר באופן תמציתי ופשוט את ה-"מה" וה-"איך", כדי להשלים את המסמכים המדעיים והפטנט של KESS שמסבירים את העקרונות תוך שימוש בפיסיקה ובמתמטיקה.
אמנם זה מתאים לחלק מהקוראים, אך לרוב האנשים אין באמת עניין בנוסחאות, משתנים, משוואות וכו ', אלא רק בהסבר פשוט וקצר על "מה זה וכיצד זה עובד?" בשפה ישירה ופשוטה להבנה.
אז ננסה.
מה זה KESS? תאי KESS מציגים את היכולת להפיק מים מתוקים במחירים סבירים וביעילות כלכלית, ללא ממברנות אוסמוזה הפוכה (RO), מנועים ומשאבות. טכנולוגיית KESS (זיקוק קינטית באנרגיה סולארית - Kinetic Energy Solar Still) מבוססת על שילוב של הרבה שיפורים קטנים ותגליות פיזיקליות שמשפרים משמעותית את היעילות הכוללת של מערכות ההתפלה, תוך צריכת אנרגיה מתחדשת בלבד (שמש, רוח, חמורים/גמלים שהולכים במעגלים, וכו').
כאשר אנשים שואלים איך תאי KESS עובדים (לאחרונה פורסמו הפטנטים בארה"ב), התשובה הטובה ביותר שלנו, עד כה, היתה להשתמש בדוגמה שכולנו יכולים להתחבר אליה. אנו מציעים כי, באופן כללי, ניתן לראות את KESS כ-"הוריקן בקופסה". התיאור ה-"ציורי" הזה די מסכם את העניין.
בדיוק כמו שהציפורים הראו לאדם שאפשר לעוף, הוריקנים יכולים להוביל אותנו להבנה, ומציעים רמזים רבים, כיצד להפיק מים ראויים לשתייה מאוקיינוסים וימים מלוחים.
כולם יודעים שהוריקנים מפיקים ואוספים כמויות אדירות של מים מתוקים מאוקיינוסים וימים מלוחים, מובילים אותם וממטירים אותם (לפעמים הרבה מטרים מהם) על קרקע יבשה. ראינו וחווינו זאת ממקור ראשון.
מדענים מתייחסים לכוכב הלכת שלנו כ-"מערכת פתוחה". כלומר, האדם אינו יכול לשלוט ואינו שולט ברבים מתהליכים אלו - אנו יכולים רק להתבונן, לצפות, לנטר ולתעד את התוצאות. מהי מהירות הרוח? מהן טמפרטורות האוויר והמים? היכן וכמה מים נאספים? מה לחץ האוויר? וכו'.
אבל, מה אם, מה אם, בתוך "מערכת סגורה" לחלוטין היה ניתן לא רק להתבונן במשתנים אלה ולנטר אותם, אלא לשלוט בהם, לשפר ולהגדיל אותם באותה עת? במשוואת האידוי המקובלת, בה משתמשים כמעט 60 שנה, יש רק ששה (6) משתנים. תאי KESS לא רק שולטים במשתנים אלה ב-"קופסה" (מערכת סגורה), אלא אף מוסיפים עוד עשרה (10) שבעבר לא תוארו ובעיקר לא היו מוכרים, ובמקביל מבצעים אופטימיזציה ושיפור של כל אחד מהם. כאשר מסכמים את כל השיפורים הקטנים (וכמה גדולים) הללו, בתוך מערכת סגורה, השיפור שנוצר בתהליך ייצור המים משמעותי.
אנו יודעים (שולטים ומשפרים) כיצד המים המזוקקים מופרדים/מתאדים מהמים המלוחים. אנו יודעים (שולטים ומשפרים) היכן ומתי המים מתעבים ונאספים. אנחנו יודעים (ושולטים) מה מידות הטמפרטורות והלחצים הפנימיים יהיו. אנחנו יודעים (וממקסמים) מהם פני השטח המאדים בתוך המערכת (לא עוד ברמה של (X*Y), אלא ברמה של כמעט (X*Y)3 ). איך? בין השאר, על ידי אופטימיזציה של המשטחים ובקרה באמצעות מערכות בקרה פנימיות מתוכנתות (PLC - בקרות ממוחשבות אוטומטיות), חיישנים ושסתומים.
אם מבינים ומצייתים לפיזיקה ולמה שהמתמטיקה אומרת שחייב לקרות, השאר כנראה פשוט, בתנאי שהדרישות ידועות ומבוקרות.
תאי KESS האוטונומיים הבדידים והמודולריים מיישמים בפועל את התוצאה הנובעת ממה שהמשוואות מתארות. למעשה, ניתן לראות את החלקים בתוך המערכת ואת המשתנים המתאימים להם. כל זה הגיוני לגמרי, כשזה מוצג באופן הנכון.
בואו ניקח צעד אחורה ונבחן בזריזות את טכנולוגיות ההתפלה המתחרות בהשוואה ל-KESS: התפלה באוסמוזה הפוכה (RO), וסולארית סטנדרטית ורב-שלבית.
מערכות RO בעולם חולקות בסיס תיאורטי ומאפיינים משותפים: דוחפים את המים המלוחים דרך ממברנות חדירות למחצה כדי ללכוד את יוני המלח, משתמשים בחלק ניכר של המים שהופקו לשטיפת הממברנות מהמלח, ואז זורקים את התמלחת (הרעילה המרוכזת) בחזרה למקור המים (ים, אוקיינוס, וכו'), וחוזר חלילה.
באילו לחצים פועלות מערכות RO להתפלת מי ים (SWRO)? הן פועלות בטווח של פי 70-140 מהלחץ האטמוספרי - וזה הרבה. לחץ זה דורש החלפה תכופה של ממברנות יקרות, משאבות ענק יקרות ומנועים זוללי זרם חזק, ולאחר מכן זורקים כמעט ½ מהמים שנשאבו בחזרה לים כתמלחת מרוכזת ופסולת רעילה לסביבה שהורגת את כל מה שיש ב-"שטח מת" עצום. זה RO (SWRO), בקצור נמרץ - "טוב, רע ומכוער".
הערה: יש להדגיש כאן שהטכנולוגיה של KESS (בזכות היעדרן של ממברנות שעלולות להיסתם) תפעל טוב מאוד בתיאום עם (לא נגד) מתקני SWRO. איך? תאי KESS יכולים לקבל בקלות את התמלחת הרעילה ממערכות SWRO ולהפריד אותה ביעילות לתוצרי מלח, שניתן לאסוף בשקים, ולמים. תאי KESS יכולים ללא מאמץ להשיג את מה שמערכות RO לא יכולות.
הבה נתבונן כעת בכמה מהניסיונות המוקדמים להתפלה סולארית. אנשים רבים - מבריקים, מלומדים וממומנים היטב - נכשלו בכיוונים אלה, תוך התעלמות (או אולי חוסר היכרות) מהפיזיקה והעקרונות הבסיסיים. מערכות מוקדמות יותר ניסו למקד את מרב האנרגיה הסולארית (עם מראות פרבוליות גדולות וכד') על פני משטחים קבועים, אופקיים, מזעריים (צינורות עגולים ארוכים, וכד').
כיוון שההנחה הרווחת היתה שיש לחמם את המים לנקודת הרתיחה בה נוצר קיטור - והתפלה תתרחש, כל המערכות הללו דרשו טמפרטורות גבוהות (100°C), אשר (על פי חוקי הגזים הבסיסיים) יוצרים בהכרח לחץ אדים גבוה (שלמעשה פעל בניגוד ישיר לאידוי שניסו להשיג), כך שנדרשה אנרגיה (יקרה) רבה יותר לפצות בצורה לא יעילה, ואז לעבות ולאסוף את המים. תרחישים אלו יצרו בעיות רבות: הצינורות נסתמו במהירות, מערכות כשלו וזאת במשך הזמן הקצר בו פעלו - רק בשעות היום (הערה: KESS פועלת 24/7).
הבהרה: הלקח הנלמד מהרתחת מים אינו צריכת האנרגיה הגבוהה והטמפרטורות הנדרשות, אלא פליטה מתמשכת של אדים מהתמיסה, אשר משחררת מולקולות מים כשאוויר עולה מהנוזל. תאי KESS יוצרים "שחרור גז" נפחי באמצעים הרבה פחות יקרים מהאנרגיות העצומות שדרושות להרתחות מים.
בואו נראה איך הוריקנים (ותאי KESS) פועלים. כמו בהוריקנים, תאי KESS אינם דורשים לחצים גבוהים. למעשה, הוריקנים ותאי KESS פועלים ביעילות בלחצים נמוכים מאוד, תת-אטמוספריים, לא 70-140 אטמוספירות. כמו כן, תאי KESS אינם דורשים טמפרטורות גבוהות - למעשה תאי KESS פועלים ביעילות בסביבות 32°C, כמו כל הוריקן, ותאי KESS, כמו הוריקנים, הם ממש לא סטאטיים, להבדיל מכל מערכות ההתפלה הסולארית הקודמות.
למעשה, טכנולוגיית KESS שאבה בחלקו את השם המסחרי שלה, שרשום ב-WIPO (הארגון העולמי לקניין רוחני), מסביבה סוערת ואלימה, כמו הוריקנים, על ידי שילוב של ערבוב קינטי במספר רמות. מכיוון שנעשה שימוש במערכת בלחץ קטן/אפסי ומעט או אפס מומנט/חיכוך מכני (יחסית ל-RO), נחוצה ונדרשת רק מעט אנרגיה יקרה.
הוריקנים מעבים מים על ידי קירור ותהליכים אחרים; כך גם תאי KESS, אך לא על ידי עלייה לגובה, אלא על ידי הגברת הלחץ האטמוספרי (תוך הפחתה בו-זמנית של הלחץ האטמוספרי בשלב האידוי), ולאחר מכן ירידה עם זרם האוויר הלח, תוך שימוש בטמפרטורת הסביבה ה-"אוניברסלית" הנמוכה של כדור הארץ, כדי ליצור ירידות טמפרטורה חדות, לעתים קרובות של 22-28°C, לקירור מרכיבי משטח האיסוף, כנדרש לאופטימיזציה של העיבוי.
אם כך, כאשר בוחנים את הכיוונים שכל האחרים הלכו בהם, והם הלכו כולם בכיוון אחד, טכנולוגיית KESS הולכת בדיוק לכיוון הנגדי - כשכולם הולכים ימינה, KESS הולכים שמאלה, ולהיפך. זהו סיכום קצר, בו פרטים "מסווגים" רבים כמובן הושמטו, אבל באופן כללי, זהו, בקיצור, KESS.
ציפה: תאי KESS אינם בהכרח על הקרקע, כפי שמקובל לצפות או לשער. נציין כאן שתאי KESS מתוכננים ומהונדסים גם לצוף. כאשר מפרצים מוגנים, מפרצונים ונמלים הם המקום היחיד הזמין, תאי KESS יכולים לייצר מים טהורים בעודם צפים.
מגבלות: שום דבר אינו מושלם או בחינם, ומסמך זה יהיה לא שלם בלי להזכיר את שני הצדדים של המשוואה. בעוד תאי KESS הרבה יותר זולים להתקנה ולהפעלה, קלים יותר לשימוש, הרבה יותר יעילים אנרגטית, ו-(הכי חשוב)-לחלוטין ידידותיים לסביבה, יש מצבים בהם תאי KESS אינם הפתרון הטוב ביותר:

  • תאי KESS דורשים שטח משמעותית גדול יותר (פי 3-4) מ-RO, על בסיס יחס מ"ק מופק / מ"ר שטח. אם שטח אינו זמין או יקר מאוד, תאי KESS עלולים לא להיות הפתרון הטוב ביותר.

  • תאי KESS עדיין זקוקים להחזרה של מינרלים בריאותיים קריטיים (mg+, וכו') למים המופקים (כמו כל מים מזוקקים/מבוקבוקים) אם משתמשים בהם למטרות שתייה לאורך זמן.

  • תאי KESS אינם פועלים היטב במקורות מים שמזוהמים ב-VOC (volatile organic compound / לחץ אדים גבוה). אם הכרחי להתפיל מים מזוהמים ב-VOC, נדרשת מערכת לטיפול קדם ב-VOC.

  • אם תוצרי הלוואי אינם בעלי ערך מסחרי/סחירים (להבדיל ממלח), ייתכן שיהיה צורך באתר אחסון מאושר ובהובלה.

  • עם זאת; ברוב המקרים תאי KESS צפויים להיות החלופה הריאלית היחידה למערכות RO מבחינת עלות תועלת. באזורים בהם אין גישה למקור חשמל בעל ספיקה גבוהה או מקור דלק קבוע/זול, תאי KESS הם כנראה החלופה היחידה. ביחס לסביבה ולכדור הארץ, הבחירה ברורה.
    ליצירת קשר ולמידע נוסף:
    For more information, contact: Mark D Goodley at (840) 999-2629: markdgoodley@gmail.com

    Download
    0

    Click here to
    Download
    English Only

    Download
    0

    Click here to download
    Hebrew translation

    תרגום לעברית

    Download
    0

    Click here to
    download
    English/Hebrew
    interlinear version
    תרגום בין - לינארי

    Salt Water
    Reverse Osmosis Systems
    (SWRO)

    SWRO is very expensive to build, operate and maintain, is energy inefficient, implements expensive SWRO membranes, requires high energy pressure pumps and returns more than 50% of a highly toxic, environmentally hazardous waste material back to the water source.


    Kinetic Energy Solar Still
    (KESS®©)

    KESS is a revolutionary new scaleable, water desalination system which operates on renewable energy sources, is very energy efficient, requires minimal maintenance, reduces waste, has a very small carbon footprint, has no membranes to change and no water returns to the source: salt is the only by-product.

    KESSWater.com
    How much power does KESS require to produce fresh water? or
    How many kilowatt hours (kWh) / per Meter3 fresh water?
    (…and that’s just the start of the cost and operational problems for SWRO…)
     

    In the SWRO (sea water reverse osmosis) and heat evaporation worlds, this is one of the most important and used defining attributes of any system.

    For KESSWater.com, this is not as relevant a term, though the equivalent will be offered here to try and put things on as equal a level playing field as possible.

    For those that just want a quick answer…at the cost of putting the cart before the horse a bit, the quick, rough answer is approx.. * = < 1kWh /1 meter
    3 water.

    To put things into grand perspective.  A typical SWRO plant requires up to 10 kWh ( over 10X/1,000% times) the energy to produce a cubic meter of water.  

    All SWRO systems produce water that still has salt in it… many passes are required to get to a potable quality water… KESSWater on the other hand, requires only a single pass to produce nearly ion free deionized/distilled water.

    That is just the beginning of the downfall of all SWRO systems however.  

    KESSWater has almost none of the permanent infrastructure, machinery, parts and maintenance expenses of SWRO.

    There are no semi-permeable membranes, high psi pumps, high amp motors, combustion chambers, high pressure vessels, or SS plumbing, etc.… for it all… Not to mention the infrastructure and/or storage facilities for whatever fossil fuel is being used… to boil the water, to produce the steam, to turn the blades, to generate the electricity, to push the motors, to drive the 1,000 psi pumps, through the semi-permeable membranes, etc., etc.,  etc…  In KESSWater, you can just throw all of that away.

    In other words, KESSWater cells will have almost a 100% online operating efficiency.    There is virtually nothing to ever go bad or wrong.

    Compare that to any SWRO system ever manufactured whose average downtime is about one month (800 hrs.) a year.   So, let’s say a KESSWater field has 10 systems, all operating autonomously and independently.  When one is down for 30 minutes a week to be cleaned, the other nine are still operating at full capacity.  Compare that to SWRO.

    The reason for the “*” above is that unlike SWRO systems, the KESSWater answer changes a bit and depends upon a few atmospheric variables.  Water temp., air temp., atmospheric pressure, etc.

    On a hot, arid day, low pressure day with warm water temps., the production is different than a cold, humid, high-pressure day.  Both extremes produce water at significantly less energy cost than SWRO, but the actual number varies with the conditions, even in a closed KESSWater cell system.

    The Layman’s Guide to KESS®© Technologies
    Optimized Modular Desalination Cells
    Helping to solve the world’s fresh water shortage


    Many have asked for a simple concise guide to complement the KESS Science and Patent White Papers, which focuses on the “how” and “why” questions, primarily utilizing the physics and the math.

    While appropriate for some, most people aren’t really interested in formulas, variables, equations, etc. … just a simple quick explanation, “What is “It”, and How does “It” work? ...in straightforward simple to understand language.

    So here goes.

    What is KESS? KESS Cells represents the ability to affordably and economically extract fresh water from salt/brackish waters on a modularly based large scale, without RO membranes, motors, and pumps. At its lowest common denominator, KESS (Kinetic Energy Solar Still) captures and sums many small incremental improvements and discovered physics phenomena, to vastly increase the overall efficiency of desalination systems, while importantly, requiring only renewable energy (solar, wind, donkeys/camels walking in circles, etc.).

    When people ask how KESS works (recently U.S. Patents and Intr’l WIPO Trademark published), our best reply, to date, has been to use an example most all of us can relate to. We offer that, generally speaking, KESS can be thought of as a “hurricane in a box”. Painting that “word picture” pretty much says it all.

    Just like birds hinting to men, that flight Was possible, hurricanes can lead us to understand, and offer many hints for how to extract fresh drinkable water from the saline oceans/seas.

    Most everyone knows that hurricanes are responsible for extracting and collecting massive amounts of fresh water, from the salt water oceans/seas, transporting and dumping (sometimes many feet of it), onto dry land. We’ve seen and experienced this first hand.

    The planet is what scientists universally call an “open system”. That is, man can’t and doesn’t control any of these many processes… We can only observe, monitor, and record the results. How fast are the winds? What are the air and water temps? Where and how much water is collected? What is the air pressure? Etc.…

    But, What If, what IF, in a fully enclosed “closed system” you could not only observe and monitor these variables, but control, optimize and maximize them at the same time as well? The standard accepted evaporation predication equation used for almost 60 years has only (6) variables. KESS not only controls these variables in a “box” (closed system), but adds another (10) previously undescribed and primarily unknown variables; while simultaneously optimizing and maximizing each. And when you sum all these small (and some large) incremental improvements, within a closed system, the resultant production gain is sizeable.

    We KNOW (control and optimize) how the fresh water separates/evaporates from the salt water. We KNOW (control and optimize) where and when the water will condense and collect. We KNOW (and control) what the internal temps and pressures are. We KNOW (and maximize) what the evaporative surface areas are; (no longer squared on a level (X*Y), but rather nearly (X*Y) ^3)) inside the system. How? In some part, by optimizing the surface areas and controlled via programmed internal micro voltage powered PLC’s (automated computer controls), sensors and valves.

    IF you understand and comply with the physics and what the math says MUST happen, the rest is seemingly straightforward, providing the appropriate are known and controlled.

    The autonomous discrete and modular KESS Cell devices actually then become the derivate result of what the equations describe. In fact, you can see the parts in situ and their corresponding variables. It all makes perfect sense, once seen in the proper light.

    Let’s take a step back and quickly look at the competing desalination technologies and how they compare to KESS. Reverse Osmosis (RO), standard and multi-effect Solar Desalination.

    RO systems, universally, all share common theory and attributes. Push salt water through semi-permeable membranes that capture the salt ions, using much of this extracted water to backflush the salt out of the membranes, then dump the resulting (highly toxic concentrated) brine back into the source (sea, ocean, etc.), then repeat.

    What pressures do RO and salt water RO (SWRO) systems require? Anywhere from 1,000 – 2,000 psi… Which is a LOT. This requires expensive, often replaced membranes, huge, expensive pumps, and even larger high wattage, power draining motors. And, afterwards you’re dumping more than half of the intake water right back into the ocean/sea, as a highly toxic, environmentally hazardous waste material concentrated brine that kills everything in huge “dead zones”. That’s RO (SWRO), in a nutshell. “Good, bad, and ugly.”

    Note: It should be strongly emphasized here that KESS technology, (owing to the absence of foulable/clogged membranes), will be working extremely well in concert with, (not against) SWRO plants. How? KESS can easily accept the toxic effluent water from SWRO systems, and efficiently reduce it down to its baggable byproducts salt, and water. KESS can effortlessly go places where no RO system can.

    Let’s now look at some of the earlier attempts at solar desalination. Many bright, learned, and well-funded people have failed in these directions. Ignoring (or perhaps unfamiliar with the physics and underlying principles). Earlier systems attempted to focus maximum solar energy (with large parabolic mirrors, etc.) onto static, horizontal, minimized, surface areas (long round pipe tubes, etc.)

    As it was “known and assumed” that water needed to heated to the boiling point for steam to form, and desalination to occur, all of these systems required high temps (at 212º F/100ºC), which (according to the basic gas laws) necessarily resulted in high vapor pressures (which in actuality was acting in direct opposition to the evaporation they were trying to achieve) resulting in the need for even more (expensive) power to inefficiently compensate, then condense and collect the water. These scenarios created multiple problems. The pipes quickly clogged; systems failed. And, for the short time they were operating, only ran during daylight hours. (Note: KESS operates 24/7).

    Memo/Hint: The take away to be learned from water boiling isn’t the high joule input and temperatures required, rather, it is the continuous release of gas from solution, which unbinds/captures and frees water molecules from solution as the air rises from the liquid. KESS induces a volumetric “gas release” via much less costly means than the mega joules required for boiling water.

    Lets’ look at how hurricanes (and KESS) operate. As with hurricanes, KESS doesn’t require high pressures… In fact, hurricanes and KESS operate efficiently at very low pressures, minus psi, not 1,000-2,000 psi. Likewise, KESS doesn’t require high temps, in fact KESS operates efficiently at around 90ºF, like every hurricane. And KESS, like hurricanes, are anything but static, like all other prior solar desalination systems.

    In fact, KESS derives its WIPO World trademarked name in part, from a highly agitated, violent, environment, just like hurricanes, by introduction of kinetic mixing on several levels. As no/little pressure or mechanical torque/friction is introduced into the system (relative to RO), very little costly power is necessary or required.

    Hurricanes condense water by cooling and other processes; so does KESS, but not by going up in elevation, but by increasing atmospheric pressure (again while simultaneously decreasing atmospheric pressure in the prior evaporation phase), and then going downward with the humidified air flow, utilizing the earth’s “universal” planet wide, below grade ambient temperature, to create temperature delta drops often in excess of 40º-50ºF, to cool the surface collection elements, necessary for condensation optimization.

    So, if you look at the directions all the others have taken, and they have all gone in one direction, KESS goes in the exact opposite… When they all have Zigged, KESS has Zagged…. This is a brief summary, with many of the “classified” details obviously omitted, but in general, That’s KESS in a nutshell.

    Floatable: KESS Cells are not necessarily land based as might be expected or presumed. It should be inserted here that KESS cells are designed and engineered to also float. Where protected bays, inlets, and harbors are the only space available, KESS cells can produce their fresh water, while floating.

    KESS downsides: Nothing is perfect or free and this paper would be incomplete without mentioning both sides of the equation. While KESS will be much cheaper to install and operate, easier to use, far more energy efficient, and (most critically) - completely environmentally benign and Safe, KESS Cells are not the best solution in all situations.

    • KESS requires substantially more land area (3-4X) than RO, on a strictly - m^3 water produced / m^2 land area basis. So if land area is unavailable or at a high premium, KESS may not be the best solution. Piping the salt/saline water to inexpensive unused land for KESS to operate may offer the best compromise.
    • KESS still needs critical health minerals (mg+, etc.) re-added to the produced fresh water (like all distilled/bottled water) if used for long term drinking purposes.
    • KESS does not seamlessly work in VOC (volatile organic compound/high vapor pressure) contaminated water sources. IF necessary a VOC pre-treatment system is still required.
    • If the byproduct(s) is/are not a valuable /saleable commodity (like salt), then an approved storage site and transportation may be required.

    That being said; in most situations KESS will likely be the only cost effective and viable alternative to RO today. In areas without access to substantial electrical power, or a continuous/affordable fuel source, KESS is potentially the only option. In relation to the environment and planet, the choice is clear.




    For more information, contact: Mark D Goodley at (840) 999-2629: markdgoodley@gmail.com

    KESS technology will work and play well with existing SWRO facilities to mitigate the adverse environmental impact of SWRO’s return waste toxic brine.

    It’s no secret that Reverse Osmosis salt water desalination (SWRO) has severe environmental impact issues. Whole geographic marine regions are suffering greatly, or have already died from the highly toxic saline brine that has/is back-washed into the seas and oceans. Marine life and irreplaceable coral reefs have been killed. Environmental groups worldwide stand firmly united against SWRO.

    To this end, KESS technology will work in tandem, extremely well with, SWRO plants worldwide. By reducing the return volume of SWRO toxic brine, KESS will work in concert with, not adversarially against, existing SWRO technology.

    As KESS technology has no membranes to plug and foul, nor high pressure pumps to fail, nor expensive electrical utilities (with exceptionally high carbon footprint) to drain; KESS Technology easily steps in and accepts the high saline brine direct from SWRO plants, and reduces it to bag-able salt, and fresh water. The remaining salable salt will either be made available to claim, will be hauled away by outside contracted services to process the material for valuable minerals, or stored at approved sites.

    So, whether wholly renewable powered discrete KESS cells are installed independently to desalinate salt and brackish water, or KESS cells are amended to existing facilities as a “plug ‘n play” SWRO brine reduction solution, KESS technology has a role to play in protecting the environment.

    Brine reduction greatly mitigates the adverse impact that SWRO has in every location, planet wide.
    KESS technology will work and play well with existing SWRO facilities to mitigate the adverse environmental impact of SWRO’s return waste toxic brine.

    It’s no secret that Reverse Osmosis salt water desalination (SWRO) has severe environmental impact issues. Whole geographic marine regions are suffering greatly, or have already died from the highly toxic saline brine that has/is back-washed into the seas and oceans. Marine life and irreplaceable coral reefs have been killed. Environmental groups worldwide stand firmly united against SWRO.

    To this end, KESS technology will work in tandem, extremely well with, SWRO plants worldwide. By reducing the return volume of SWRO toxic brine, KESS will work in concert with, not adversarially against, existing SWRO technology.

    As KESS technology has no membranes to plug and foul, nor high pressure pumps to fail, nor expensive electrical utilities (with exceptionally high carbon footprint) to drain; KESS Technology easily steps in and accepts the high saline brine direct from SWRO plants, and reduces it to bag-able salt, and fresh water. The remaining salable salt will either be made available to claim, will be hauled away by outside contracted services to process the material for valuable minerals, or stored at approved sites.

    So, whether wholly renewable powered discrete KESS cells are installed independently to desalinate salt and brackish water, or KESS cells are amended to existing facilities as a “plug ‘n play” SWRO brine reduction solution, KESS technology has a role to play in protecting the environment.

    Brine reduction greatly mitigates the adverse impact that SWRO has in every location, planet wide.

    White Papers:

    Desalination: How the Rules Have Changed.

     

    White Paper on the Penman-Shuttleworth Equation and the Derived Accelerated Evaporation-Condensation/Collection Devices and their Environmental Impact Assessment for 2018.
     
    Introduction:
     
    This paper introduces a new approach to salt/brackish water desalination and water purification. A new system, KESS®©, incorporates a unique large scale distillation hardware design which effectively and efficiently can use only renewable energy as the power source.  Patent and Trademarks were recently “allowed” and are soon to be issued by the USPTO and WIPO government offices.  International patents are being filed soon.
     
    Abstract:
     
    Production of clean fresh water is of critical importance planet wide, particularly between 45 deg. +/- of the equator where water sources are already severely depleted, and some will soon vanish altogether.  As the demand for fresh water increases with the world’s population, and the supply of fresh water decreases due to weather conditions, the challenges to produce adequate amounts of fresh water are increasing daily.  Current solar desalination systems produce fresh water, but inefficiently and very slowly. Salt Water Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) systems produce fresh water, but expensively and with major negative ecological impact.
    Contained herein is a greatly improved solar desalination system that overcomes physical and chemical water production barriers and limits, utilizing 100% renewable solar and/or wind derived kinetic energy.  The net effects substantially increase both the evaporation and the recovery/condensation capture rates vs. the accepted standard pan evaporation rate.  Several scalable embodiments/configurations are presented, representing differences in production, usage and transportation/delivery logistics.

    Desalination: How the Rules Have Changed.

     

    White Paper on the Penman-Shuttleworth Equation and the Derived Accelerated Evaporation-Condensation/Collection Devices and their Environmental Impact Assessment for 2018.
     
    Introduction:
     
    This paper introduces a new approach to salt/brackish water desalination and water purification. A new system, KESS®©, incorporates a unique large scale distillation hardware design which effectively and efficiently can use only renewable energy as the power source.  Patent and Trademarks were recently “allowed” and are soon to be issued by the USPTO and WIPO government offices.  International patents are being filed soon.
     
    Abstract:
     
    Production of clean fresh water is of critical importance planet wide, particularly between 45 deg. +/- of the equator where water sources are already severely depleted, and some will soon vanish altogether.  As the demand for fresh water increases with the world’s population, and the supply of fresh water decreases due to weather conditions, the challenges to produce adequate amounts of fresh water are increasing daily.  Current solar desalination systems produce fresh water, but inefficiently and very slowly. Salt Water Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) systems produce fresh water, but expensively and with major negative ecological impact.
    Contained herein is a greatly improved solar desalination system that overcomes physical and chemical water production barriers and limits, utilizing 100% renewable solar and/or wind derived kinetic energy.  The net effects substantially increase both the evaporation and the recovery/condensation capture rates vs. the accepted standard pan evaporation rate.  Several scalable embodiments/configurations are presented, representing differences in production, usage and transportation/delivery logistics.

    page1image1821984
    December 3, 2018
    Via Email
    Mark D. Goodley KESS Technologies, Inc. 4272 Dant Blvd. Reno, NV 89509
    Re: Overview of Allowed U.S. Patent Application No. 15/879,695, Entitled “System and Method for Evaporation and Collection of Liquids”
    Dear Mark:
    KESS Technologies, Inc. (“KESS”) has asked Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale, and Dorr LLP (“WilmerHale”) to provide an overview of the subject matter of allowed U.S. Patent Application No. 15/879,695 (“the ‘695 application”), entitled “System and Method for Evaporation and Collection of Liquids,” and the legal requirements for obtaining an issued patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).
    In conducting our analysis, we have reviewed the ‘695 application as filed with the USPTO, a non-final Office Action from the USPTO dated May 10, 2018, concerning the ‘695 application, Applicant’s Reply to the non-final Office Action filed on July 9, 2018, the Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due from the USPTO for the ‘695 application, and the allowed claims of the ‘695 application. Our overview of the legal standards for obtaining a U.S. patent and the allowed ‘695 application follows.
    I. SUMMARY
    A patent gives the patentee the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing subject matter that falls within the scope of the patented claims. See 35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(1). The ‘695 application is directed to systems, methods, and devices for the efficient and increased rate of evaporation and collection of liquids, including desalination of water.
    Following a relatively short period of prosecution, the USPTO determined that the pending claims of the ‘695 application satisfy the statutory requirements for patentability. This determination from the USPTO indicates that the claimed subject matter of the allowed ‘695 patent application has utility and is novel and nonobvious over the prior art. The claims of a patent issued by the USPTO are presumed to be legally valid. See 35 U.S.C. § 282.
    page1image3694144 page1image849824
    page1image1821984
    December 3, 2018
    Via Email
    Mark D. Goodley KESS Technologies, Inc. 4272 Dant Blvd. Reno, NV 89509
    Re: Overview of Allowed U.S. Patent Application No. 15/879,695, Entitled “System and Method for Evaporation and Collection of Liquids”
    Dear Mark:
    KESS Technologies, Inc. (“KESS”) has asked Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale, and Dorr LLP (“WilmerHale”) to provide an overview of the subject matter of allowed U.S. Patent Application No. 15/879,695 (“the ‘695 application”), entitled “System and Method for Evaporation and Collection of Liquids,” and the legal requirements for obtaining an issued patent from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”).
    In conducting our analysis, we have reviewed the ‘695 application as filed with the USPTO, a non-final Office Action from the USPTO dated May 10, 2018, concerning the ‘695 application, Applicant’s Reply to the non-final Office Action filed on July 9, 2018, the Notice of Allowance and Fee(s) Due from the USPTO for the ‘695 application, and the allowed claims of the ‘695 application. Our overview of the legal standards for obtaining a U.S. patent and the allowed ‘695 application follows.
    I. SUMMARY
    A patent gives the patentee the right to exclude others from making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing subject matter that falls within the scope of the patented claims. See 35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(1). The ‘695 application is directed to systems, methods, and devices for the efficient and increased rate of evaporation and collection of liquids, including desalination of water.
    Following a relatively short period of prosecution, the USPTO determined that the pending claims of the ‘695 application satisfy the statutory requirements for patentability. This determination from the USPTO indicates that the claimed subject matter of the allowed ‘695 patent application has utility and is novel and nonobvious over the prior art. The claims of a patent issued by the USPTO are presumed to be legally valid. See 35 U.S.C. § 282.
    page1image3694144 page1image849824

    Click here to download the full document -
    "Patent White Paper"

    Download
    0

    Business Plan: